AI Grading for Schools and Coaching Centers
When a whole grade sits an exam, marking becomes a logistics problem. Proctor AI gives schools and coaching centers one platform to grade in bulk, apply the same rubric across every teacher, run integrity checks, and share analytics, while each teacher still approves their own marks.
It turns days of distributed marking into an afternoon, without sacrificing consistency or accountability.
- 1,000+ papers per batch
- One rubric across all markers
- Shared analytics by class and cohort
- Hours not days, to results
Why institutions standardize on Proctor AI
- One shared rubric applied identically by every marker
- Bulk grading of whole grades and exam batches
- Integrity analysis across cohorts to flag copying
- Class, section, and cohort analytics in one place
- Each teacher reviews and approves their own marks
Consistency across teachers
| Challenge | How Proctor AI helps |
|---|---|
| Different teachers mark differently | One rubric, applied the same way to every paper |
| Marking takes days | Bulk grading clears batches in hours |
| Copying is hard to catch at scale | Integrity analysis flags it across the cohort |
| No clear view of performance | Cohort analytics by class and question |
| Accountability concerns | Every mark is reviewed and approved by a teacher |
Frequently asked questions
How does AI grading help a whole school?
It standardizes the rubric across every marker, grades exams in bulk, flags integrity issues across cohorts, and shares analytics, while each teacher still approves their own marks.
Can it handle a full grade sitting exams?
Yes. It processes 1,000+ papers per batch and typically returns a grade-level exam in well under an hour.
Does every teacher keep control of their marks?
Yes. Grading is teacher-approved: the agent does the first pass, and each teacher reviews and adjusts before finalizing.
How do schools usually start?
By piloting one exam alongside manual marking, then expanding across departments once they see the results.